Dr Danielle Bond

The interaction of acute myeloid leukaemic (AML) blasts with the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is a major determinant governing disease progression and resistance to treatment. The constitutive expression of E-selectin in the vascular compartment of BM, a key endothelial cell factor, directly mediates chemoresistance via E-selectin ligand/receptors. Despite the success of hypomethylating agent (HMA)-containing regimens to induce remissions in older AML patients, the development of primary or secondary resistance is common. We report that following treatment with 5-azacitidine, promoter regions regulating the biosynthesis of the E-selectin ligands, sialyl Lewis X, become further hypomethylated. The resultant upregulation of these gene products, in particular a(1,3)-fucosyltransferase VII (FUT7) and a(2,3)-sialyltransferase IV (ST3GAL4), likely causes functional E-selectin binding. When combined with the E-selectin antagonist uproleselan, the adhesion to E-selectin is reversed and the survival of mice transplanted with AML cells is prolonged. Finally, we present clinical evidence showing that BM myeloid cells from higher risk MDS and AML patients have the potential to bind E-selectin, and these cells are more abundant in 5-azacitidine-non-responsive patients. The collective data provide a strong rationale to evaluate 5-azacitidine in combination with the E-selectin antagonist, uproleselan, in this patient population.

Background: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a deadly disease characterised by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature myeloid cells within the bone marrow. Altered regulation of DNA methylation is an important epigenetic driver of AML, where the hypoxic bone marrow microenvironment can help facilitate leukaemogenesis. Thus, interactions between epigenetic regulation and hypoxia signalling will have important implications for AML development and treatment. Main body: This review summarises the importance of DNA methylation and the hypoxic bone marrow microenvironment in the development, progression, and treatment of AML. Here, we focus on the role hypoxia plays on signalling and the subsequent regulation of DNA methylation. Hypoxia is likely to influence DNA methylation through altered metabolic pathways, transcriptional control of epigenetic regulators, and direct effects on the enzymatic activity of epigenetic modifiers. DNA methylation may also prevent activation of hypoxia-responsive genes, demonstrating bidirectional crosstalk between epigenetic regulation and the hypoxic microenvironment. Finally, we consider the clinical implications of these interactions, suggesting that reduced cell cycling within the hypoxic bone marrow may decrease the efficacy of hypomethylating agents. Conclusion: Hypoxia is likely to influence AML progression through complex interactions with DNA methylation, where the therapeutic efficacy of hypomethylating agents may be limited within the hypoxic bone marrow. To achieve optimal outcomes for AML patients, future studies should therefore consider co-treatments that can promote cycling of AML cells within the bone marrow or encourage their dissociation from the bone marrow.

Cancer is a disease of global epigenetic dysregulation. Mutations in epigenetic regulators are common events in multiple cancer types and epigenetic therapies are emerging as a treatment option in several malignancies. A major challenge for the clinical management of cancer is the heterogeneous nature of this disease. Cancers are composed of numerous cell types and evolve over time. This heterogeneity confounds decisions regarding treatment and promotes disease relapse. The emergence of single-cell epigenomic technologies has introduced the exciting possibility of linking genetic and transcriptional heterogeneity in the context of cancer biology. The next challenge is to leverage these tools for improved patient outcomes. Here we consider how single-cell epigenomic technologies may address the current challenges faced by cancer clinicians.

Nerve infiltration is essential to prostate cancer progression, but the mechanism by which nerves are attracted to prostate tumors remains unknown. We report that the precursor of nerve growth factor (proNGF) is overexpressed in prostate cancer and involved in the ability of prostate cancer cells to induce axonogenesis. A series of 120 prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) samples were analyzed by IHC for proNGF. ProNGF was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells, with marked expression in cancer compared with BPH. Importantly, the proNGF level positively correlated with the Gleason score (n = 104, tB = 0.51). A higher level of proNGF was observed in tumors with a Gleason score of =8 compared with a Gleason score of 7 and 6 (P < 0.001). In vitro, proNGF was detected in LNCaP, DU145, and PC-3 prostate cancer cells and BPH-1 cells but not in RWPE-1 immortalized nontumorigenic prostate epithelial cells or primary normal prostate epithelial cells. Co-culture of PC12 neuronal-like cells or 50B11 neurons with PC-3 cells resulted in neurite outgrowth in neuronal cells that was inhibited by blocking antibodies against proNGF, indicating that prostate cancer cells can induce axonogenesis via secretion of proNGF. These data reveal that ProNGF is a biomarker associated with high-risk prostate cancers and a potential driver of infiltration by nerves.