| 2025 |
Zafar H, Cheah JH, Ho JA, Suseno Y, Tian F, 'How green servant leadership influences organizational green performance? The roles of employee green creativity, voluntary pro-environmental behavior and green psychological climate', Personnel Review (2025) [C1]
Purpose: Drawing from the resource-based view and social information processing theory, this study explores the role of green servant leadership on organizational green... [more]
Purpose: Drawing from the resource-based view and social information processing theory, this study explores the role of green servant leadership on organizational green performance and the mechanisms underpinning this relationship. Design/methodology/approach: This study focuses on the textile industry in Pakistan, known as one of the most environmentally polluting sectors globally. Data were collected from 32 textile companies in the Punjab province of Pakistan. Using a purposive sampling approach, we distributed questionnaires in two phases with a two-week interval. In the first phase, 800 surveys were distributed, resulting in 457 valid responses for the second phase of data collection. Findings: Our findings shed light on the relationship between green servant leadership and organizational green performance through the mediating role of employees' green creativity, particularly in the presence of higher levels of green psychological climate. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that employees' green creativity and voluntary pro-environmental behavior sequentially mediate the relationship between green servant leadership and organizational green performance. We also found evidence for the interaction between green psychological climate and employees' green creativity in enhancing organizational green performance. The implications of these findings for both theory and practice are discussed in this study. Originality/value: This study offers a significant contribution to the literature by exploring the multifaceted drivers of organizational green performance. It integrates the roles of green servant leadership, green creativity, voluntary pro-environmental behavior and green psychological climate, presenting a holistic understanding of how leadership influences sustainability outcomes. By introducing serial mediation through employees' green creativity and voluntary pro-environmental behavior, the research provides new insight into the mechanisms underpinning these relationships. Furthermore, the inclusion of green psychological climate as a moderating factor advances theoretical discussions on contextual influences in green servant leadership. Beyond theoretical contributions, this study offers practical guidance for managers and policymakers by identifying actionable strategies to foster environmentally responsible workplace behaviors, promote innovative green practices and align organizational policies with sustainability goals.
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2025 |
Sharma S, Albishri N, Zafar H, Singhal AB, Singh G, 'Shades of green and transformational leadership: Predicting employees' green creativity and green work engagement at work', Acta Psychologica, 259 (2025) [C1]
|
|
|
| 2025 |
Zafar H, Tian F, Ho JA, Roh T, Latif B, 'Understanding voluntary pro-environmental behavior among colleagues: Roles of green crafting, psychological empowerment, and green organizational climate', BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT [C1]
A concerning surge in pollution has drawn increased attention to sustainability efforts. The lack of environmentally conscious human behavior contributes significantly ... [more]
A concerning surge in pollution has drawn increased attention to sustainability efforts. The lack of environmentally conscious human behavior contributes significantly to environmental degradation. This research explores the impact of perceived colleague support towards the environment (PCSE) as a catalyst for promoting employees' green initiatives. Underpinned by the conservation of resources (COR) theory, the study reveals a sequential chain mediation model, wherein PCSE initiates a process leading to voluntary pro-environmental behavior (VPEB) among employees, facilitated by green crafting (GC) and a supportive green organization climate (GOC). Additionally, the study examines the moderating role of psychological empowerment (PE) on the relationship between GC and GOC. Data were collected at two-wav points with a 2-week gap from the Pakistani textile sector. Results indicate that GC and GOC serially mediate the relationship between PCSE and VPEB of employees. Furthermore, the results support the mediation of GOC between PCSE and VPEB. However, the results did not support the moderating impact of PE. The study discusses important theoretical and practical implications for fostering green initiatives among employees.
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2025 |
Zafar H, Gupta P, Malik A, Agarwal V, Alsabban A, 'Does coworker support drive corporate sustainable development in the tourism sector?', Tourism Recreation Research (2025) [C1]
|
|
|
| 2024 |
Zafar H, Suseno Y, 'Examining the Effects of Green Human Resource Management Practices, Green Psychological Climate, and Organizational Pride on Employees' Voluntary Pro-Environmental Behavior', ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 37, 581-609 (2024) [C1]
Drawing on social exchange theory and social identity theory, we examined a sequential mediation process linking green human resource management practices and employees... [more]
Drawing on social exchange theory and social identity theory, we examined a sequential mediation process linking green human resource management practices and employees' voluntary pro-environmental behavior. We also considered the aspects of green psychological climate and organizational pride in the relationship between green human resource management practices and voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Through the analysis of data from 459 employees and their 109 respective managers working in Pakistan's textile industry, we found that a green psychological climate mediates the relationship between green human resource management practices and organizational pride. We also found that green psychological climate and organizational pride sequentially mediate the relationship between green human resource management practices and employees' voluntary pro-environmental behavior. The findings of the study provide important implications for theory and practice, as they offer insights into how organizations can effectively implement green human resource management practices and encourage their employees to engage in voluntary pro-environmental behavior.
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2023 |
Zafar H, Malik A, Gugnani R, Agarwal R, Nijjer S, 'Green thumbs at work: Boosting employee eco-participation through ecocentric leadership, green crafting, and green human resource management', JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 432 (2023) [C1]
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2023 |
Zafar H, Ho JA, Cheah J-H, Mohamed R, 'Promoting pro-environmental behavior through organizational identity and green organizational climate', ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 61, 483-506 (2023) [C1]
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2022 |
Zafar H, Ho JA, Cheah J-H, Mohamed R, 'Catalyzing voluntary pro-environmental behavior in the textile industry: Environmentally specific servant leadership, psychological empowerment and organizational identity', JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 378 (2022) [C1]
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2022 |
Zafar H, Tian F, Ho JA, Zhang G, 'Environmentally specific servant leadership and voluntary pro-environmental behavior in the context of green operations: A serial mediation path', FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 13 (2022) [C1]
|
|
Open Research Newcastle |
| 2021 |
Inam A, Ho JA, Zafar H, Khan U, Sheikh AA, Najam U, 'Fostering Creativity and Work Engagement Through Perceived Organizational Support: The Interactive Role of Stressors', SAGE OPEN, 11 (2021) [C1]
|
|
|
| 2019 |
Zafar H, Mehmood KK, 'Innovation as a mediator between Innovative Culture, Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Management, Learning Orientation, and Performance', JISR management and social sciences & economics, 17, 149-164 [C1]
|
|
|