The CSI Effect – DNA Evidence in Court

Friday, 9 May 2014

Daniel Matas of the University of Newcastle Legal Centre argues that DNA-based evidence is not cut and dried proof in court

It's called the 'CSI Effect'. A phenomenon where jurors, largely influenced by the frequent viewing of crime television shows, blindly follow the DNA evidence despite the utterly improbable case theory put forward. Daniel Matas, a solicitor and lecturer at the University of Newcastle Legal Centre, discusses this in an Op-Ed piece for the Newcastle Herald.

Daniel argues that the prevalence of television shows like CSI: Crime Scene Investigation has led people to believe that DNA-based evidence is all the proof a prosecutor needs. Rather, at its highest, all DNA proves is that an accused could be the offender, not that they are.

Read the full article here.


Contact Daniel Matas
Phone (02) 4921 8690