A rubric is set of rules or instructions attached to a task. The term ‘rubric’ comes from the fact that they were often printed in red. In student assessment a rubric lists the criteria for a piece of work, giving the characteristics and qualities needed to successfully complete the particular task or assignment.
For example, an essay rubric will outline a number of relevant criteria such as essay organisation and structure, knowledge of the content area, use of reference material, and the mechanics of spelling, and grammar.
A good rubric will describe the levels of quality for each of the criteria, usually on a point scale. Under mechanics, for example, the rubric might define the lowest level of performance as "More than ten grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors," and the highest level as "all words are spelt correctly; work shows understanding of subject-verb agreement, when to make words possessive, and how to use commas, semicolons and periods."
A useful rubric will provide:
Use rubrics to:
Does it relate to the outcome(s) being measured?
Does it cover important dimensions of student performance?
Does it address anything extraneous?
Do the criteria reflect current conceptions of ‘excellence’ in your field?
Are the categories or scales well-defined?
Is there a clear basis for assigning scores at each scale point?
Can different assessors apply the rubric consistently?
Moskal, Barbara M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3). Retrieved November 22, 2005 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3
Tierney, Robin & Marielle Simon (2004). What's still wrong with rubrics: focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(2). Retrieved November 22, 2005 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=2
A Tool for Assessing the Quality and Use of Rubrics in Education
| Criteria | 1) Unacceptable | 2) Acceptable | 3) Good/Solid | 4) Exemplary |
| Clarity of criteria |
Criteria being assessed are unclear, inappropriate and/or have significant overlap |
Criteria being assessed can be identified, but are not clearly differentiated or are inappropriate |
Criteria being assessed are clear, appropriate and distinct |
Each criteria is distinct, clearly delineated and fully appropriate for the assignment(s)/course |
| Distinction between Levels |
Little/no distinction can be made between levels of achievement |
Some distinction between levels is made, but is not totally clear how well |
Distinction between levels is apparent |
Each level is distinct and progresses in a clear and logical order |
| Reliability of Scoring |
Cross-scoring among faculty and/or students often results in significant differences |
Cross-scoring by faculty and/or students occasionally produces inconsistent results |
There is general agreement between different scorers when using the rubric (e.g. differs by less than 5-10% or less than 1/2 level) |
Cross-scoring of assignments using rubric results in consistent agreement among scorers |
| Clarity of Expectations/ Guidance to Learners |
Rubric is not shared with learners |
Rubric is shared and provides some idea of the assignment/ expectations |
Rubric is referenced - used to introduce an assignment/guide learners |
Rubric serves as primary reference point for discussion and guidance for assignments as well as evaluation of assignment(s), |
| Support of Metacognition (Awareness of Learning) |
Rubric is not shared with learners |
Rubric is shared but not discussed/ referenced with respect to what is being learned through the assignment(s)/course |
Rubric is shared and identified as a tool for helping learners to understand what they are learning through the assignment/ in the course |
Rubric is regularly referenced and used to help learners identify the skills and knowledge they are developing throughout the course/ assignment(s) |
| Engagement of Learners in Rubric Development/ Use * |
Learners are not engaged in either development or use of the rubrics |
Learners offered the rubric and may choose to use it for self assessment |
Learners discuss the design of the rubric and offer feedback/input and are responsible for use of rubrics in peer and/or self-evaluation |
Faculty and learners are jointly responsible for design of rubrics and learners use them in peer and/or self-evaluation |
Scoring chart:
0 - 10 = needs improvement
11 - 15 = workable
16-20 = solid/good
21-24 = examplary
Source: Monmouth University Instructional Technology Services, Faculty Resource Center Training Series