HomeUniversity ServicesTeaching and Learning Services → Learn About Rubrics

<< Return to rubric main page

Learn About Rubrics


 

What Is A Rubric?

A rubric is set of rules or instructions attached to a task. The term ‘rubric’ comes from the fact that they were often printed in red. In student assessment a rubric lists the criteria for a piece of work, giving the characteristics and qualities needed to successfully complete the particular task or assignment.

For example, an essay rubric will outline a number of relevant criteria such as essay organisation and structure, knowledge of the content area, use of reference material, and the mechanics of spelling, and grammar.

A good rubric will describe the levels of quality for each of the criteria, usually on a point scale. Under mechanics, for example, the rubric might define the lowest level of performance as "More than ten grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors," and the highest level as "all words are spelt correctly; work shows understanding of subject-verb agreement, when to make words possessive, and how to use commas, semicolons and periods."

A useful rubric will provide:

^ Top

Why Use a Rubric?

^ Top

How Can Rubrics be Used?

In Class

For Marking

Use rubrics to:

^ Top

Checklist: Before You Use Your Rubric.

Does it relate to the outcome(s) being measured?

Does it cover important dimensions of student performance?

Does it address anything extraneous?

Do the criteria reflect current conceptions of ‘excellence’ in your field?

Are the categories or scales well-defined?

Is there a clear basis for assigning scores at each scale point?

Can different assessors apply the rubric consistently?

References

Moskal, Barbara M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3). Retrieved November 22, 2005 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3

Tierney, Robin & Marielle Simon (2004). What's still wrong with rubrics: focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(2). Retrieved November 22, 2005 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=2

^ Top

Creating a Rubric – Key Steps:

  1. Identify the type and purpose of the Rubric.
    Consider what you want to evaluate and why, and on what basis (graded or non-graded, marks or grades)
  2. Identify Distinct Criteria to be evaluated
    Refer to the course objectives and develop your criteria for the assignment directly from your objectives. Make sure that the distinctions between the assessment criteria are clear.
  3. Determine your levels of assessment
    Identify your range and scoring scales, deciding on numeric base scores, percentages or grades.
  4. Describe each level for each of the criteria, clearly differentiating between them
    For each criterion, differentiate clearly between the levels of expectation. Whether holistically or specifically, there should be no question as to where a product/performance would fall along the continuum of levels. (Hint: Start at the bottom (unacceptable) and top (mastery) levels and work your way “in”).
  5. Involve learners in development and effective use of the Rubric
    Developing the rubric in consultation with the class or discussing it with them helps them to understand your expectations and makes them explicitly aware of what and how they are learning and their responsibility in the learning process.
  6. Pre-test and retest your rubric
    A valid and reliable rubric is generally developed over time. Each use with a new group of learners or a colleague provides an opportunity to tweak and enhance it.

^ Top

A Rubric For Rubrics

A Tool for Assessing the Quality and Use of Rubrics in Education

Criteria 1)  Unacceptable 2)  Acceptable 3)  Good/Solid 4)  Exemplary
Clarity of criteria

Criteria being assessed are unclear, inappropriate and/or have significant overlap

Criteria being assessed can be identified, but are not clearly differentiated or are inappropriate

Criteria being assessed are clear, appropriate and distinct

Each criteria is distinct, clearly delineated and fully appropriate for the assignment(s)/course

Distinction between Levels

Little/no distinction can be made between levels of achievement

Some distinction between levels is made, but is not totally clear how well

Distinction between levels is apparent

Each level is distinct and progresses in a clear and logical order

Reliability of Scoring

Cross-scoring among faculty and/or students often results in significant differences

Cross-scoring by faculty and/or students occasionally produces inconsistent results

There is general agreement between different scorers when using the rubric (e.g. differs by less than 5-10% or less than 1/2 level)

Cross-scoring of assignments using rubric results in consistent agreement among scorers

Clarity of Expectations/ Guidance to Learners

Rubric is not shared with learners

Rubric is shared and provides some idea of the assignment/ expectations

Rubric is referenced - used to introduce an assignment/guide learners

Rubric serves as primary reference point for discussion and guidance for assignments as well as evaluation of assignment(s),

Support of Metacognition (Awareness of Learning)

Rubric is not shared with learners

Rubric is shared but not discussed/ referenced with respect to what is being learned through the assignment(s)/course

Rubric is shared and identified as a tool for helping learners to understand what they are learning through the assignment/ in the course

Rubric is regularly referenced and used to help learners identify the skills and knowledge they are developing throughout the course/ assignment(s)

Engagement of Learners in Rubric Development/ Use *

Learners are not engaged in either development or use of the rubrics

Learners offered the rubric and may choose to use it for self assessment

Learners discuss the design of the rubric and offer feedback/input and are responsible for use of rubrics in peer and/or self-evaluation

Faculty and learners are jointly responsible for design of rubrics and learners use them in peer and/or self-evaluation

*Considered optional by some educators and a critical component by others

Scoring chart:
0 - 10 = needs improvement
11 - 15 = workable
16-20 = solid/good
21-24 = examplary

Source: Monmouth University Instructional Technology Services, Faculty Resource Center Training Series

^ Top

<< Return to rubric main page