| 2024 |
Forbes E, Clover K, Oultram S, Wratten C, Kumar M, Tieu MT, et al., 'Situational anxiety in head and neck cancer: Rates, patterns and clinical management interventions in a regional cancer setting.', J Med Radiat Sci, 71 100-109 (2024) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2023 |
Forbes E, Baker AL, Britton B, Clover K, Skelton E, Moore L, et al., 'A systematic review of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce procedural anxiety among patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer', CANCER MEDICINE, 12 20396-20422 (2023) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2023 |
Beck AK, Baker AL, Britton B, Lum A, Pohlman S, Forbes E, et al., 'Adapted motivational interviewing for brief healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment fidelity in real-world evaluations of behaviour change counselling.', Br J Health Psychol, 28 972-999 (2023) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2023 |
Forbes E, Clover K, Baker AL, Britton B, Carlson M, McCarter K, ''Having the mask on didn't worry me until they clamped my head down so I wouldn't move': A qualitative study exploring anxiety in patients with head and neck cancer during radiation therapy.', J Med Radiat Sci, 70 283-291 (2023) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2022 |
Baker AL, Forbes E, Pohlman S, McCarter K, 'Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among People with Severe Mental Disorder.', Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 18 99-124 (2022) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2022 |
Forbes E, Clover K, Baker AL, McCarter KL, Oultram S, Kumar M, et al., 'Biofeedback Enabled CALM (BeCALM)-the feasibility of biofeedback on procedural anxiety during radiation therapy: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial', BMJ OPEN, 12 (2022)
|
|
|
| 2022 |
Handley T, Jorm C, Symington C, Christie L, Forbes E, Munro A, Cheney R, ''It sort of has the feel of being at home': Mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot community-based palliative end-of-life service in a regional setting.', Aust J Rural Health, 30 582-592 (2022) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2022 |
Baker AL, McCarter K, Brophy L, Castle D, Kelly PJ, Cocks N, et al., 'Adapting Peer Researcher Facilitated Strategies to Recruit People Receiving Mental Health Services to a Tobacco Treatment Trial', FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 13 (2022) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2022 |
McCarter K, Baker AL, Wolfenden L, Wratten C, Bauer J, Beck AK, et al., 'Smoking and other health factors in patients with head and neck cancer.', Cancer epidemiology, 79 102202 (2022) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2020 |
Forbes E, Baker AL, Britton B, Clover K, Skelton E, Oultram S, et al., 'Non-pharmacological approaches to procedural anxiety reduction for patients undergoing radiotherapy for cancer: systematic review protocol', BMJ OPEN, 10 (2020)
|
|
|
| 2019 |
Beck AK, Forbes E, Baker AL, Britton B, Oldmeadow C, Carter G, 'Adapted motivational interviewing for brief healthcare consultations: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment fidelity in real-world evaluations of behaviour change counselling', BMJ OPEN, 9 (2019)
|
|
|
| 2018 |
McCarter KL, Baker A, Britton B, Halpin S, Beck A, Carter G, et al., 'Head and neck cancer patient experience of a new dietitian-delivered health behaviour intervention: "You know you have to eat to survive ', SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 26 2167-2175 (2018) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2018 |
McCarter K, Britton B, Baker AL, Halpin SA, Beck AK, Carter G, et al., 'Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: Systematic review', BMJ Open, 8 (2018) [C1]
|
|
Nova |
| 2017 |
Thornton L, Quinn C, Birrell L, Guillaumier A, Shaw B, Forbes E, et al., 'Free smoking cessation mobile apps available in Australia: a quality review and content analysis', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 41 625-630 (2017) [C1]
Objectives: This review aimed to identify free, high-quality, smoking cessation mobile applications (apps) that adhere to Australian smoking cessation treatment guidelines. Method... [more] Objectives: This review aimed to identify free, high-quality, smoking cessation mobile applications (apps) that adhere to Australian smoking cessation treatment guidelines. Methods: A systematic search of smoking cessation apps was conducted using Google. The technical quality of relevant apps was rated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale. The content of apps identified as high quality was assessed for adherence to smoking cessation treatment guidelines. Results: 112 relevant apps were identified. The majority were of poor technical quality and only six ¿high-quality¿ apps were identified. These apps adhered to Australian treatment guidelines in part. The efficacy of two apps had been previously evaluated. Conclusions: In lieu of more substantial research in this area, it is suggested that the high-quality apps identified in this review may be more likely than other available apps to encourage smoking cessation. Implications for public health: Smoking cessation apps have the potential to address many barriers that prevent smoking cessation support being provided; however few high-quality smoking cessation apps are currently available in Australia, very few have been evaluated and the app market is extremely volatile. More research to evaluate smoking cessation apps, and sustained funding for evidence-based apps, is needed.
|
|
Nova |
| 2017 |
Beck AK, Forbes E, Baker AL, Kelly PJ, Deane FP, Shakeshaft A, et al., 'Systematic review of SMART Recovery: Outcomes, process variables, and implications for research.</', Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31 1-20 (2017) [C1]
Clinical guidelines recommend Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART Recovery) and 12-step models of mutual aid as important sources of long-term support for addiction recov... [more] Clinical guidelines recommend Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART Recovery) and 12-step models of mutual aid as important sources of long-term support for addiction recovery. Methodologically rigorous reviews of the efficacy and potential mechanisms of change are available for the predominant 12-step approach. A similarly rigorous exploration of SMART Recovery has yet to be undertaken. We aim to address this gap by providing a systematic overview of the evidence for SMART Recovery in adults with problematic alcohol, substance, and/or behavioral addiction, including (i) a commentary on outcomes assessed, process variables, feasibility, current understanding of mental health outcomes, and (ii) a critical evaluation of the methodology. We searched six electronic peer-reviewed and four gray literature databases for English-language SMART Recovery literature. Articles were classified, assessed against standardized criteria, and checked by an independent assessor. Twelve studies (including three evaluations of effectiveness) were identified. Alcohol-related outcomes were the primary focus. Standardized assessment of nonalcohol substance use was infrequent. Information about behavioral addiction was restricted to limited prevalence data. Functional outcomes were rarely reported. Feasibility was largely indexed by attendance. Economic analysis has not been undertaken. Little is known about the variables that may influence treatment outcome, but attendance represents a potential candidate. Assessment and reporting of mental health status was poor. Although positive effects were found, the modest sample and diversity of methods prevent us from making conclusive remarks about efficacy. Further research is needed to understand the clinical and public health utility of SMART as a viable recovery support option.
|
|
Nova |
| 2016 |
Beck AK, Baker A, Kelly PJ, Deane FP, Shakeshaft A, Hunt D, et al., 'Protocol for a systematic review of evaluation research for adults who have participated in the "SMART recovery' mutual support programme', BMJ OPEN, 6 (2016)
|
|
|
| 2015 |
McCarter KL, Britton B, Baker A, Halpin S, Beck A, Carter G, et al., 'Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: Systematic review protocol', BMJ Open, 5 (2015) [C3]
|
|
Nova |
